Assessment of patients with menorrhagia: How valid is a structured clinical history as a measure of health status?
A questionnaire for menorrhagia based on a structured clinical history demonstrated good reliability and validity when compared to general health measures.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
The paper developed and tested a patient-administered questionnaire for women with menorrhagia based on structured gynecologic history questions, using literature review to devise items, internal consistency and test-retest reliability checks, and validation against SF-36 general health scores and family practitioner perceptions of severity. The main sample included 351 women, with 246 referred to gynecology ambulatory clinics and 105 from four training practices in North-east Scotland, and two questions were discarded after testing. The final questionnaire showed good reliability and significant correlations between patient scores and SF-36 scale scores. This study does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Full text
5,325 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· 2 sections
· click to expand
Abstract
References
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Citation neighborhood
Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.
References (29)
- W3470488 via openalex
- W1673749503 via openalex
- W1965863645 via openalex
- W1980822858 via openalex
- W1995633792 via openalex
- W1998207473 via openalex
- W1998884854 via openalex
- W2003094610 via openalex
- W2012165536 via openalex
- W2015795623 via openalex
- W2019398887 via openalex
- W2024728251 via openalex
- W2029724069 via openalex
- W2037377025 via openalex
- W2050573915 via openalex
- W2063032334 via openalex
- W2077764703 via openalex
- W2083967436 via openalex
- W2097047879 via openalex
- W2109133579 via openalex
- W2142857867 via openalex
- W2156000474 via openalex
- W2159306398 via openalex
- W2492614289 via openalex
- W2525474878 via openalex
- W4238542638 via openalex
- W4292806894 via openalex
- W6673444376 via openalex
- W6681243696 via openalex
Cited by (20)
- Measurement of changes to the menstrual cycle: A transdisciplinary systematic review evaluating measure quality and utility for clinical trials 2024
- Vaginal bromocriptine for treatment of adenomyosis: Impact on magnetic resonance imaging and transvaginal ultrasound 2020
- Comparison between Golnar product and placebo in heavy menstrual bleeding: A double-blind randomized clinical trial. 2020
- Current and Future Medical Therapies for Adenomyosis 2020
- Patient-reported outcome measures in benign gynecologic surgery: updates and selected tools 2019
- Vaginal bromocriptine improves pain, menstrual bleeding and quality of life in women with adenomyosis: A pilot study 2019
- “Evaluation of the effect of roasted lentil flour (lentil savigh) as a functional food in menstrual bleeding reduction” 2019
- Menstrual questionnaires for clinical and research use 2016
- The menstrual bleeding questionnaire: development and validation of a comprehensive patient-reported outcome instrument for heavy menstrual bleeding 2015
- Effect of myrtle fruit syrup on abnormal uterine bleeding: a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study 2014
- A multi-centre randomised controlled trial assessing the costs and benefits of using structured information and analysis of women's preferences in the management of menorrhagia 2012
- Linguistic and clinical validation of the Arabic-translated Aberdeen Menorrhagia Severity Scale as an indicator of quality of life for women with abnormal uterine bleeding 2012
- Questioning Our Questions: Do Frequently Asked Questions Adequately Cover the Aspects of Women's Lives Most Affected by Abnormal Uterine Bleeding? Opinions of Women with Abnormal Uterine Bleeding Participating in Focus Group Discussions 2010
- Health-related quality of life and economic burden of abnormal uterine bleeding 2009
- Financial and Quality-of-Life Burden of Dysfunctional Uterine Bleeding Among Women Agreeing To Obtain Surgical Treatment 2008
- Uterine myomas, dyspareunia, and sexual function 2006
- Bipolar radio frequency endometrial ablation compared with balloon endometrial ablation in dysfunctional uterine bleeding: Impact on patients' health-related quality of life 2005
- A multicentre randomised controlled trial assessing the costs and benefits of using structured information and analysis of women's preferences in the management of menorrhagia 2003
- Quality of life instruments in studies of menorrhagia: a systematic review 2002
- A randomised comparison of medical and hysteroscopic management in women consulting a gynaecologist for treatment of heavy menstrual loss 1997
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-06-02T02:00:03.124865+00:00