Assessment of patients with menorrhagia: How valid is a structured clinical history as a measure of health status?

In: Quality of Life Research · 1995 · vol. 4(1) , pp. 33–40 · doi:10.1007/bf00434381 · W2035655054
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 20 in-corpus citations
Full text JSON View on OpenAlex View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06+body, 2026-06-08

A questionnaire for menorrhagia based on a structured clinical history demonstrated good reliability and validity when compared to general health measures.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08 · read from full text

The paper developed and tested a patient-administered questionnaire for women with menorrhagia based on structured gynecologic history questions, using literature review to devise items, internal consistency and test-retest reliability checks, and validation against SF-36 general health scores and family practitioner perceptions of severity. The main sample included 351 women, with 246 referred to gynecology ambulatory clinics and 105 from four training practices in North-east Scotland, and two questions were discarded after testing. The final questionnaire showed good reliability and significant correlations between patient scores and SF-36 scale scores. This study does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 5,325 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

A patient-administered questionnaire for menorrhagia based on the type of questions asked when taking a gynaecological history was developed and tested using the following steps: literature reviews, devising the questions, testing responses for internal consistency and test-retest reliability and validating the questionnaire by comparing patient's scores with their responses to the SF-36 general health measure, and with family practitioner perceptions of severity. The main sample consisted of 351 women with menorrhagia, 246 referred to gynaecology ambulatory clinics and 105 from four large training practices in North-east Scotland. Following testing, two questions were discarded from the questionnaire. The final questionnaire demonstrated a good level of reliability and the resulting patient scores correlated significantly with their scores on the scales making up the general health measure. The questions asked in taking a clinical history from a woman with menorrhagia can be used to construct a valid and reliable measure of health status. This clinical measure may be a useful guide in selection for treatment and in the assessment of patient outcome following treatment. Similar content being viewed by others

References

HalbergL, HogdahlA, NilssonL, RyboG. Menstrual blood loss—a population study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1966; 45: 320. CoulterA, NooneA, GoldacreM. General practitioners' referrals to specialist out patient clinics. Br Med J 1989; 299: 304–308. PokrasR, HunagelV (1987). Hysterectomy in the United States, 1965–1984. Vital and Health Statistics, Series 13, No 92 DHSS Publ No. (PHS) 87-1753. Washington DC: Govt Printing Office. MacdonaldR. Modern treatment of menorrhagia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1991; 97: 3–6. McPhersonK, StrongPM, EpsteinA, JonesL. Regional variations in the use of common surgical procedures; within and between England and Wales, Canada and the United States of America. Soc Sci Med 1981; 15A: 273–288. WareJE, SherbourneCD. The SF-36 health status survey: I. conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30: 473–483. GarrattAM, RutaDA, AbdallaMI, BuckinghamJK, RussellIT. The SF 36 health survey questionnaire: an outcome measure suitable for routine use within the NHS? Br Med J 1993; 306: 1440–1444. StreinerGL, NormanDR. Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990. GarrattAM, MacdonaldLM, RutaDA, RussellIT, BuckinghamJK, KrukowskiZH. The measurement of outcome for patients with varicose veins. Qual Health Care 1993; 2: 5–10. CronbachLJ (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951; 6: 297–334. KlineP. A Handbook of Test Construction. London: Methuen, 1986. JolliffeIT, MorganBJT. Principal component analysis and exploratory factor analysis. Stat Methods Med Res 1992; 1: 69–95. HelmstatderGC. Principles of Psychological Measurement. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1964. BlandJM, AltmanDG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986, i: 307–510. McHorneyCA, WareJE, RaczekAE. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): II. psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care 1993; 31: 247–263. McHorney CA, Ware JE, Rogers W, Raczek AE, Racel JF. The validity and relative precision of MOS short-and long-form health status scales and Dartmouth COOP charts. Med Care 1992; Suppl 30: MS253–MS265. StewartAL, HaysRD, WareJE, et al. The MOS short-form general health survey. Med Care 1988; 26: 724–733. JenkinsonC, CoulterA, WrightL. Short form 36 (SF 36) health survey questionnaire: normative data for adults of working age. Br Med J 1993; 306: 1437–1440. NewtonJ, BarnarG, CollinsWA. A rapid method for measuring menstrual blood loss using automatic extraction. Contraception 1977; 16: 269. FraserIS, McCarronG, MarkhamR, RestaT. Blood and total fluid content of menstrual discharge. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 65: 194–198. LevinJR, WagnerG. Absorption of menstrual discharge by tampons inserted during menstruation: quantitative assessment of blood and total fluid content. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1986; 93: 765–772. HaynesPJ, HodgsonH, AndersonABM, TurnbullAC. Measurement of menstrual blood loss in patients complaining of menorrhagia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1977; 84: 763–768. ReesMCP. Role of menstrual blood loss measurements in management of complaints of excessive menstrual bleeding. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1991; 98: 327–328. JachuckSJ, BrierleyH, JachuckS, et al. The effect of hypotensive drugs on the quality of life. J R Coll Gen Pract 1982; 32: 103–105. Author information Authors and Affiliations Additional information This research and the Health Services Research Unit are both funded by the Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Office Home and Health Department; however the opinions expressed are those of the authors, not the SOHHD. Rights and permissions About this article Cite this article Ruta, D.A., Garratt, A.M., Chadha, Y.C. et al. Assessment of patients with menorrhagia: How valid is a structured clinical history as a measure of health status?. Qual Life Res 4, 33–40 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00434381 Received: Accepted: Issue date: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00434381

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (29)

Cited by (20)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-02T02:00:03.124865+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK