ISPOG European Consensus Statement - chronic pelvic pain in women (short version)

Guideline OA: green CC0 ⤵ 17 in-corpus citations
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-07 ⓘ

A European working group adapted the German guideline for chronic pelvic pain in women to create a consensus statement integrating medical and psychosocial aspects of diagnosis and treatment.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

To date there is no international guideline on chronic pelvic pain available that focuses on medical, psychosomatic and psychological diagnostics and treatment of this complicated disease pattern. In this paper, a European working group, which was established in October 2010, aims to bridge this gap. The working group decided to use the current German guideline as source text and to transform it into a European consensus statement by deleting parts that apply only to the conditions of the German health system. The literature search included papers published up to and including December 2010, using Medline search and by adding some new search terms. This manuscript reports the essential facts of the above-mentioned consensus statement. Within this article we use the term "psychosomatic" as the integrated concept of medical and psychosocial aspects of a disease.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

chronic_pelvic_pain

MeSH descriptors

Genital Diseases, Female Pelvic Pain Pelvic Pain Pelvic Pain Pelvic Pain Pelvic Pain Quality of Life Chronic Pain Female Genital Diseases, Female Humans Pain Management Pain Management Pain Measurement Pain Measurement Pain Perception

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (21)

Cited by (16)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T21:16:42.682428+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK