Keywords
uterine artery; pseudoaneurysm; deep endometriosis; hemoperitoneum in pregnancy
Corresponding Author: Zoe McGovern Feld, B.A.
Florida International University Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine
Miami, UNITED STATES
Corresponding Author Secondary
Information:
Corresponding Author's Institution: Florida International University Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine
Corresponding Author's Secondary
Institution:
First Author: Zoe Feld, B.A.
First Author Secondary Information:
Order of Authors: Zoe Feld, B.A.
Tami Rowen, M.D.
Andrew Callen, M.D.
Ruth Goldstein, M.D.
Liina Poder, M.D.
Order of Authors Secondary Information:
Funding Information:
Abstract
Uterine, ovarian, and placental pathologies are among the differential considerations
for a pregnant woman presenting with abdominal and pelvic pain. Imaging plays a key
role in the initial workup of these patients. Sonography is often the first line test,
however evaluation of pelvic pathology can be limited in the gravid state, especially in
mid- or late- term pregnancy. We present a case of a pregnant woman who came to
the emergency room at 25 weeks with acute abdominal and pelvic pain. Both
ultrasound and MR imaging findings revealed intraperitoneal hemorrhage, initially of
unknown origin, as well as endometriomas and deep endometriosis. Only postpartum
imaging confirmed a uterine artery pseudoaneurysm (PSA) presumably due to
decidual reaction in deep endometriosis. We speculate the intraperitoneal hemorrhage
was subsequently due to the PSA. This case demonstrates that if hemorrhage is not
recognized promptly, it can lead to hemodynamic instability, as well as premature labor
and delivery.
Powered by Editorial Manager® and ProduXion Manager® from Aries Systems Corporation
Title Page
Click here to access/download
Title Page
Title page with author information - Emergency
Radiology.docx
Abstract
Uterine, ovarian, and placental pathologies are among the differential considerations for a
pregnant woman presenting with abdominal and pelvic pain. Imaging plays a key role in the
initial workup of these patients. Sonography is often the first line test, however evaluation of
pelvic pathology can be limited in the gravid state, especially in mid- or late- term pregnancy.
We present a case of a pregnant woman who came to the emergency room at 25 weeks with
acute abdominal and pelvic pain. Both ultrasound and MR imaging findings revealed
intraperitoneal hemorrhage, initially of unknown origin, as well as endometriomas and deep
endometriosis. Only postpartum imaging confirmed a uterine artery pseudoaneurysm (PSA)
presumably due to decidual reaction in deep endometriosis. We speculate the intraperitoneal
hemorrhage was subsequently due to the PSA. This case demonstrates that if hemorrhage is not
recognized promptly, it can lead to hemodynamic instability, as well as premature labor and
delivery.
Background
Uterine, ovarian, and placental pathologies are among the differential considerations for a
pregnant woman presenting with abdominal and pelvic pain. Imaging plays a key role in the
initial workup of these patients. Sonography is often the first line test, however evaluation of
pelvic pathology can be limited in the gravid state, especially in mid- or late- term pregnancy. In
these cases, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be helpful but may also be difficult to
interpret in advanced stages of pregnancy. Endometriosis-associated spontaneous
hemoperitoneum in pregnancy (SHiP) is a very rare condition and is difficult to diagnose
preoperatively. Patients may be initially hemodynamically stable with a nonspecific physical
exam.1 Complications of endometriosis, specifically vascular compromise, are not common
enough to be routinely considered in the patient’s initial workup but the following case
highlights the importance of this diagnosis. We present a case of a pregnant woman who came to
the emergency room at 25 weeks with acute abdominal and pelvic pain. Both ultrasound and MR
imaging findings revealed intraperitoneal hemorrhage, initially of unknown origin, as well as
endometriomas and deep endometriosis. Only postpartum imaging confirmed a uterine artery
pseudoaneurysm (PSA) presumably due to decidual reaction in deep endometriosis. We
speculate the intraperitoneal hemorrhage was subsequently due to the PSA. We found no
previously reported cases in the literature of spontaneous PSA developing in decidualized
endometriosis. Intraperitoneal hemorrhage is a serious complication during pregnancy. This case
demonstrates that if hemorrhage is not recognized promptly, it can lead to hemodynamic
instability, as well as premature labor and delivery.
Case presentation:
A 37-year-old G1P0000 woman at 23w2d was admitted for significant abdominal pain. She had
a past medical history significant for chronic microcytic anemia and granulomatosis with
polyangiitis (GPA), placental mosaicism and intrauterine growth restriction as well as a bladder
mass noted on routine obstetric ultrasound, felt to be benign on cystoscopy (and turned out to be
another site of deep endometriosis). On labor and delivery, she was found to have frequent
contractions on tocometer. Her exam was unremarkable but her laboratory workup showed a
BLIND Manuscript--SHOULD NOT CONTAIN AUTHOR
INFORMATION
Click here to view linked References
hemoglobin was noted to drop from 11.5 10 days prior to 8.9 on the day of admission. A limited
obstetric ultrasound showed no evidence of placental abruption. She had no cervical change and
was presumed to have pain from preterm contractions, was placed on disability due to the pain
and followed up as an outpatient. She was seen for a formal obstetric ultrasound 11 days after
discharge, now 25w1d and was continuing to report severe abdominal pain, reporting 5 days of
acute on chronic sharp right lower quadrant abdominal pain. There was associated anorexia
without nausea, vomiting, vaginal bleeding or discharge. On exam she was afebrile and without
peritoneal signs. Due to concern for ovarian torsion, pelvic ultrasound was performed, in which
the ovaries were not adequately visualized, and multiple dilated veins were seen in the left
adnexal region (Figure 1). MRI without contrast was recommended to exclude ovarian torsion
and look for other potential causes of pelvic pain. MRI was limited due to the patient’s
discomfort during the exam but revealed extrauterine locules of T1 hyperintense material mostly
surrounding left adnexa and posterior cul-de-sac in keeping with intraperitoneal hemorrhage.
(Figure 2) The left ovary had no signs of torsion but contained a complex cyst with internal
blood products, thought to represent hemorrhagic cyst versus an endometrioma. Incidentally
noted was left uterosacral ligament asymmetric thickening with heterogeneous T2 signal with
internal hyperintense foci on T1 (Figure 3). Asymmetric hydronephrosis was present on the left
side with narrowing of the distal ureter likely due to endometriosis.
The patient was admitted for pain control and diagnostic workup. Her pain worsened and during
the observation, she reported a sudden and worsening pain, and an increase in uterine
contractions with cervical change. Repeat labs showed her hemoglobin dropped from 8.7 to 6.3,
requiring transfusion of two units of packed red blood cells. Bedside ultrasound revealed large
volume free fluid in her abdomen. The patient was taken for diagnostic laparoscopy, during
which 1600 cc of organized blood was evacuated from the pelvis. The left ovarian lesion was
identified that was moderately bleeding, intraoperatively thought to represent a hemorrhagic cyst
or endometrioma; peritoneal biopsies were obtained and sent for pathologic analysis, which
subsequently demonstrated decidual reaction. On post-operative day 1, the patient experienced
preterm premature rupture of membranes and delivered via spontaneous vaginal delivery at
25wk6d. The neonate expired at four days of life. The patient’s clinical status stabilized post-
partum and she was discharged from the hospital with a presumed diagnosis of endometriosis.
Follow up MRI with contrast three weeks after discharge revealed deep endometriosis involving
the left pelvic sidewall and left uterosacral ligament, decreased in extent compared to her prior
intra-partum exam. Within the region of deep endometriosis was a focus of intense enhancement
measuring 11 mm, suggestive of pseudoaneurysm. CT angiogram of the abdomen and pelvis
delineated the pseudoaneurysm deriving from a branch of the left uterine artery, measuring 14 x
9 mm and with no evidence of active extravasation. Subsequent embolization attempt by
interventional radiology confirmed the pseudoaneurysm but embolization was unsuccessful due
to uterine artery spasm. (Figure 4) Two weeks later, repeat MRI showed resolution of the
pseudoaneurysm. Patient is currently being followed for treatment of her newly diagnosed deep
endometriosis with the goal of conceiving in the near future and carrying to term.
Discussion
When a pregnant patient presents with lower abdominal or pelvic pain, transabdominal
sonography should be performed as the initial imaging modality. As was the case with this
patient, peritoneal implants in endometriosis can often be difficult to visualize with ultrasound.2
If the pathologic process is incompletely characterized, as in this case, it is reasonable to proceed
to noncontrast MRI, which is more specific for the diagnosis of endometriosis.3
Deep endometriosis is defined as subperitoneal invasion by endometriotic lesions causing
reactive fibrous changes which typically present as T2 hypointense masses or nodules with
irregular, indistinct or stellate margins. Intermingled T2 hyperintense foci may be observed,
reflecting ectopic endometrial glands. There may or may not be T1 hyperintense internal
endometriotic foci. The fibrous and reactive changes may demonstrate enhancement on post
contrast imaging and may raise concern for a possible neoplastic process. Typical anatomic
locations include the rectovaginal septum, uterosacral ligaments, vesicovaginal septum,
vesicouterine pouch, prevesical space, alimentary tract, and urinary tract. Involvement of the
urinary tract or uterosacral ligaments can lead to ureteral strictures and hydronephrosis. The
presence of these characteristic signal characteristics in the typical anatomic locations are
diagnostic of deep endometriosis.4
The natural history of endometriosis involves a gradual decrease in symptoms and imaging
findings throughout pregnancy, with the notable exception of the phenomenon of
decidualization. With decidual reaction induced from the gravid state, neovascularity can
develop. In this case, we speculate decidualization and subsequent neovascularity led to the
eventual development of pseudoeneurysm.5
Uterine artery pseudoaneurysm is a rare complication of endometriosis. Ferrero et al. described
uterine artery pseudoaneurysm after excision of pelvic endometriosis, but no case has been
reported in the literature of a pseudoaneurysm arising from decidiualized endometriosis without
previous surgery or an inciting event.6 Although no cases have been reported of primary uterine
artery aneurysm secondary to GPA, it is possible that this patient’s condition predisposed her to
vascular injury.
In this case, secondary arterial pseudoaneurysm was not detected until post partum contrast
enhanced MRI. Gadolinium is generally avoided in pregnancy due to its ability to cross the
placenta and potentially harm the fetus. The American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology
recommends the use of MRI contrast should be limited to situations where the diagnostic
benefits clearly outweigh the possible risks.7 Although difficult to determine prospectively, in
this case the risk from complications of intraperitoneal hemorrhage outweighs the potential risk
from gadolinium administration. We postulate that if contrast imaging was obtained earlier, the
PSA would have been detected and treated sooner, and premature delivery potentially could have
been avoided.
In summary, understanding and utilizing ultrasound and MRI as complementary modalities in
the pregnant patient with abdominal pain can expedite the diagnosis and lead to expedited
treatment and preservation of pregnancy. This case highlights a rare but important complication
of endometriosis in pregnancy.
Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Informed Consent: For this type of study, formal consent is not required.
References
1. Leone Roberti Maggiore U, Ferrero S, Mangili G et al. A systematic review on
endometriosis during pregnancy: diagnosis, misdiagnosis, complications and outcomes.
Human Reproduction Update. 2015;22(1):70-103.
2. Olive DL, Schwartz LB. Endometriosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 1993;328 (24): 1759-69
3. Woodward PJ, Sohaey R, Mezzetti TP. Endometriosis: radiologic-pathologic correlation.
Radiographics. 21 (1): 193-216
4. Coutinho et al . MR Imaging in Deep Pelvic Endometriosis: A pictorial Essay.
RadioGraphics 2011; 31:549–567
5. Poder L, Coakley FV, Rabban JT, Goldstein RB, Aziz S, Chen LM. Decidualized
endometrioma during pregnancy: recognizing an imaging mimic of ovarian malignancy. J
Comput Assist Tomogr. 2008;32(4):555–8.
6. Ferrero et al. Unusual complication of excision of pelvic endometriosis: pseudoaneurysm
of the left uterine artery. Fertil Steril. 2010 Jan;93(1):264-6
7. Guidelines for diagnostic imaging during pregnancy and lactation. Committee Opinion
No. 656. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol
2016;127:e75–8
Figures
Figure 1: Initial gray scale (A) duplex US (B) and B-mode (C) did not clearly visualize adnexa.
Dilated pelvic veins were described which were thought to represent physiologic changes. Only
retrospectively was a focal areal of increased vascularity identified correlating to the PSA on
postpartum MRI and CTA. (arrows)
Figure 2: A. T1 axial image demonstrating hyper intense material surrounding left adnexa and
cut de sac (arrow), representing extra uterine blood products consistent with intraperitoneal
hemorrhage.
Figure 3: A. T2 axial image demonstrated possible hemorrhagic cyst versus endometrioma
(arrow). Incidentally noted is asymmetric thickening of left uterosacral ligament (asterisk) and
secondarily dilated left ureter (arrow head). B. T1 hyperintense foci in the thickened left
uterosacral ligament (arrow). The constellation of findings on T1 and T2 are strongly suggestive
of deep endometriosis involving the left uterosacral ligament.
Figure 4: A. T1 post gadolinium image demonstrates mildly enhancing thickened left
uterosacral ligament (arrowheads) with focal rounded area of brisk enhancement (arrow). B.
Branch uterine artery PSA was confirmed on subsequent CT. C. Pre-embolization angiogram
concurred with the cross-sectional imaging findings (arrow)
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.