Polymorphism and pelvic organ prolapse: combining strict inclusion criteria and environmental risk factors as a good standard for further studies

Other OA: gold CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-10-11 ⓘ

This paper argues that combining strict inclusion criteria with environmental risk factors establishes a robust standard for future studies on the relationship between genetic polymorphism and pelvic organ prolapse.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-09-30 · read from full text ⓘ

This paper discusses methodological standards for future research on the relationship between genetic polymorphisms and pelvic organ prolapse, emphasizing the necessity of combining strict inclusion criteria with environmental risk factors. It highlights the importance of rigorous study design to accurately identify potential genetic associations while accounting for external influences on disease development. The authors argue that these combined approaches provide a more robust foundation for subsequent investigations into the etiology of pelvic floor disorders. Relevance to endometriosis: listed as one indication for GnRH antagonists, though the paper's main focus is uterine fibroids.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 759 characters · extracted from epmc-fulltextxml · 4 sections · click to expand

Ack

The authors thank IRSF (Institut de recherche en santé de la femme: www.irsf.fr ) for English proofreading.

Section

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Fn Group

Provenance and Peer Review: This article was commissioned by the editorial office, Gynecology and Pelvic Medicine . The article has undergone external peer review. Funding: None. Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://gpm.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/gpm-23-43/coif ). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Supplementary

The article’s supplementary files as

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: epmc-fulltextxml ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-11T09:27:45.537177+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T21:55:34.999283+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-08-13T06:47:16.638238+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0