Evaluation of the safety of time-lapse observations for human embryos
Other
OA: closed
AI-generated summary
This study found no significant differences in fertilization rates or embryo morphology between embryos cultured with frequent time-lapse observations and those with intermittent monitoring, indicating the safety of integrated optical microscope incubators.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess the effects of light from an integrated optical microscope and evaluate the safety of time-lapse observations using a built-in microscope incubator.
METHODS: We prospectively compared the fertilization rate and embryonic morphology after intracytoplasmic sperm injection between embryos cultured with time-lapse observations every 15 min in an incubator with an integrated optical microscope and embryos with intermittent observations (once a day) in conventional incubators.
RESULTS: No significant differences were observed in the fertilization rate (57.5% vs. 57.5%) or the rate of excellent-good cleavage embryos (36.0% vs. 36.0%).
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that time-lapse observations using an incubator with an integrated optical microscope may therefore be safely utilized in clinical practice.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cited by (1)
Cited by (1)
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-10-11T09:27:45.537177+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-10-08T21:07:19.155540+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-10-16T06:24:35.758740+00:00