What do I need to know about the etonogestrel-relesasing contraceptive implant (Nexplanon)?

Other OA: closed
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash+body, 2026-09-11 ⓘ

This review of the etonogestrel-releasing contraceptive implant describes its mechanism, efficacy, and safety profile while noting it improves dysmenorrhea and pelvic pain in patients with endometriosis.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-09-11 · read from full text ⓘ

This review evaluates the etonogestrel-releasing contraceptive implant (Nexplanon) as a first-line long-acting reversible contraception option for adolescents and adults, highlighting its mechanism of action, high efficacy, and safety profile. The authors note that while the device is weight-neutral and safe for postpartum use, it carries specific contraindications such as liver disease or history of breast cancer, and requires counseling regarding potential menstrual irregularities and acne. A key finding cited from clinical trials is that the implant significantly improves health-related quality of life in patients with endometriosis by reducing dysmenorrhea and noncyclic pelvic pain. Relevance to endometriosis: listed as one indication for GnRH antagonists, though the paper's main focus is uterine fibroids.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 7,616 characters · extracted from oa-html · 2 sections · click to expand

Conclusions

Despite ENG implant being used internationally for two decades, many Canadian providers have not had any exposure during their training. As education and awareness grows, we hope to see an increase in LARC use attributable to the implant in coming years. While Health Canada has not authorized the use of Nexplanon in patients under the age of 18, based on this population being excluded from the initial safety trials, there is no biologically plausible reason to restrict the device from menstruating adolescents following an informed consent discussion. Funding: There are no funders to report for this manuscript. Potential Conflicts of Interest: All authors: No reported conflicts of interest. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed.

References

- 1.Di Meglio G, Crowther C, Simms J. Contraceptive care for Canadian youth. Paediatr Child Health 2018;23(4):271–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] - 2.Palomba S, Falbo A, Di Cello A, Materazzo C, Zullo F. Nexplanon: The new implant for long-term contraception. A comprehensive descriptive review. Gynecol Endocrinol 2012;28(9):710–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] - 3.Xu H, Wade JA, Peipert JF, Zhao Q, Madden T, Secura GM. Contraceptive failure rates of etonogestrel subdermal implants in overweight and obese women. Obstet Gynecol 2012;120(1):21–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] - 4.Carvalho N, Margatho D, Cursino K, Benetti-Pinto CL, Bahamondes L. Control of endometriosis-associated pain with etonogestrel-releasing contraceptive implant and 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system: Randomized clinical trial. Fertil Steril 2018;110(6):1129–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] - 5.Secura GM, Madden T, McNicholas C, et al. Provision of no-cost, long-acting contraception and teenage pregnancy. N Engl J Med 2014;371(14):1316–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] - 6.Tyson N, Lopez M, Merchant M, Postlethwaite D. Subdermal contraceptive implant insertion trends and retention in adolescents. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2020:S1083–3188(20)30433-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2020.12.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] - 7.Romano ME, Braun-Courville DK. Assessing weight status in adolescent and young adult users of the etonogestrel contraceptive implant. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2019;32(4):409–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] - 8.Steiner RJ, Liddon N, Swartzendruber AL, Rasberry CN, Sales JM. Long-acting reversible contraception and condom use among female US high school students: implications for sexually transmitted infection prevention. JAMA Pediatr 2016;170(5):428–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-25T09:32:14.900964+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T21:33:04.308286+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-10-30T06:30:42.975179+00:00