{"paper_id":"5922f705-b693-458f-8db3-d90dc7e952a5","body_text":"Postpartum psychosis (PP) is a severe psychiatric disorder occurring shortly after childbirth in 1–2 out of every 1000 mothers ( Sit et al., 2006 ). The disorder is characterised by hallucinations, delusions, cognitive disorganisation and mood problems, and is associated with an increased risk of maternal suicide or infanticide ( Sit et al., 2006 ). The pathophysiological basis of PP is poorly understood due, in part, to the lack of an amenable animal model. The identification of biomarkers associated with increased risk is a key goal for ensuring early clinical intervention.\nIncreased PP risk is associated with a personal or family history of psychotic disorder (notably bipolar disorder), with precipitous drops in circulating oestrogens following childbirth, with obstetric complications including pre-eclampsia, and with psychosocial stressors ( Sit et al., 2006 ). Small genetic linkage and association studies have implicated regions of chromosome 16p13 and 8q24 ( Jones et al., 2007 ) and serotonergic abnormalities ( Kumar et al., 2007 ) respectively, but have not identified robust candidate genes. Recently, immune system ( Bergink et al., 2013 ) and tryptophan-kynurenine pathway ( Veen et al., 2016 ) disruptions have been demonstrated in PP, whilst regular smoking is associated with reduced risk ( Di Florio et al., 2015 ).\nMaternal deficiency for the enzyme steroid sulfatase (STS) may predispose to PP ( Davies, 2012 ); STS converts sulfated steroids to their non-sulfated forms (e.g. dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, DHEAS, to DHEA) which may act as precursors for oestrogens and androgens ( Davies, 2012 ). Maternal STS deficiency is associated with obstetric complications ( Fernandes et al., 2010 ), whilst in healthy individuals, DHEAS serum levels positively correlate with postpartum psychoticism ( Marrs et al., 2009 ); decreased postpartum DHEA levels are associated with activation of the maternal immune system ( Tagawa et al., 2004 ).\nIn the first part of the study (Experiment 1), we tested whether acute inhibition of steroid sulfatase in new mouse mothers would elicit behavioural and gene expression changes of relevance to PP. STS was inhibited using 667-COUMATE (also known as STX64), a drug that systemically and irreversibly inhibits enzyme activity by >90% in rodents at the dose used here ( Purohit et al., 2000 ). STS inhibition was indexed indirectly by measuring serum levels of DHEA(S), and levels of the stress hormone corticosterone were also measured. The behavioural tasks assayed aspects of emotional reactivity, activity and sensorimotor gating that are commonly perturbed in psychotic disorders; pup maltreatment or infanticide, which may represent a surrogate measure of PP in animals ( Quilter et al., 2007 ) was also recorded. In Experiment 2, we tested whether 667-COUMATE-induced behavioural and gene expression changes could be reversed by administration of clinically-relevant doses of the atypical antipsychotic drug ziprasidone ( Sit et al., 2006 ).\n\nVirgin C57BL/6JOlaHsd female mice (aged 12–26 weeks, originally obtained from Envigo UK and bred within Cardiff University School of Psychology), were housed in trios with males of the same strain. 3–5 days before giving birth, females were housed individually and were monitored closely until birth. Mice were maintained on  ad libitum  food and water, in a temperature, humidity and light-controlled room (21 ± 2 °C, 50 ± 10% humidity, lights on at 0700hr for 12 h) and were regularly inspected for signs of ill health. Experiments were performed according to the UK Animal Scientific Procedures Act (1986).\n<12 h after giving birth, mothers were injected  per os  (p.o.) with either vehicle solution (tetrahydrofuran:polyethylene glycol 400: distilled water in a 1:6:3 ratio ( Ireson et al., 2004 )), n = 14) or 667-COUMATE (10 mg/kg, Sigma-Aldrich, UK) in the same vehicle (n = 17) in a pseudo-randomised manner. Mothers were administered the same treatment 48 h after this first injection. The 667-COUMATE administration regime was based upon previously-published pharmacokinetic data in rodents ( Ireson et al., 2004 ,  Purohit et al., 2000 ) and was intended to provide maximal enzyme inhibition across the postpartum period whilst minimising off-target effects. Injections were performed between 09:00–10:00 h. Behavioural testing was carried out 24 h after the second injection between 09:00–13:00 h.\n<12 h after giving birth, mothers were injected  per os  (p.o.) with 667-COUMATE (10 mg/kg) as above. 24 h after the first injection, mice were injected intraperitoneally (i.p.) with either vehicle solution (1% methylcellulose in 0.9% saline) or one of two doses of ziprasidone hydrochloride (0.3 mg/kg or 1.0 mg/kg (free-base concentrations) Sigma-Aldrich, UK) in the same vehicle in a pseudo-randomised manner. 24 h later, mice received a second injection of 667-COUMATE (10 mg/kg), and 23 h after this, mice received a final injection of vehicle, 0.3 mg/kg, or 1.0 mg/kg ziprasidone. Injections were performed between 08:30–10:00h. The three experimental groups were: mice which received 667-COUMATE (10 mg/kg) with ziprasidone (0 mg/kg)(CVCV group, n = 16), mice which received 667-COUMATE (10 mg/kg) with ziprasidone (0.3 mg/kg)(CZCZ0.3 group, n = 16), and mice which received 667-COUMATE (10 mg/kg) with ziprasidone (1.0 mg/kg)(CZCZ1.0 group, n = 8). Ziprasidone doses were selected to have minimal effects on activity ( Kalinichev and Dawson, 2011 ). Behavioural testing was carried out 1hr after the final injection between the hours of 09:30–13:00 h.\nPrior to injections, mother/pup health, litter sizes and weights, and maternal weights were recorded; pup deaths or signs of maternal aggression towards the pups were noted. These measures allowed us to assess whether the drug regimes were adversely affecting gross maternal and/or pup health, and/or pup maltreatment or infanticide; we were particularly concerned that inhibition of STS in the mother’s mammary gland may affect provisioning of her pups. Only mothers who gave birth to at least one live pup were included in the study.\nMothers were initially behaviourally tested on an elevated plus-maze ( Isles et al., 2004 ) to assay anxiety-related and exploratory phenotypes. Mice were placed in a closed arm, and allowed to explore the apparatus freely for 5mins. Their lateral and vertical (‘rearing’) activity was objectively tracked using Ethovision Observer software Version 3.0.15 (Noldus Information Technology, The Netherlands); additional measures of vertical and lateral exploration (head dips from the open arms and stretch attend postures) and emotional reactivity (defecation) were recorded manually. Key measures of interest were the ratio of open arm:closed arm time and latency to first entry of the open arms (indexing anxiety), entries into the closed arms (an index of within-maze activity minimally confounded by anxiety), numbers of rears/head dips and stretch-attend postures, and numbers of fecal boli. Two seconds per animal were added to the open arm latency measure obtained from Ethovision to account for the time lag between putting the animal on the maze and initiating tracking. Following testing on the elevated plus-maze, basal activity level was tested in the dark using locomotor cages ( Isles et al., 2004 ). The number of infra-red beam breaks made over a 1hr session (4 × 15 min bins) was recorded. Finally, sensorimotor gating was assayed using a startle and prepulse inhibition (PPI) paradigm ( Dent et al., 2014 ); the main measures of interest were startle response over first three pulse alone trials (an index of emotional reactivity), the startle response for four levels of prepulse at 0, 4, 8 and 16 dB above background (P120, PP4P120, PP8P120 and PP16P120 respectively, an index of habituated startle and PPI), and startle response over pulse-alone trials with varying stimulus intensity (an index of auditory acuity). The behavioural tests were administered in order of increasing severity such that performance on the latter tests would not be substantially influenced by prior exposure to potential stressors. Mice were returned to their homecage for 5–10min between behavioural tests.\n3 h after behavioural testing, subjects were culled by cervical dislocation. Trunk blood was collected in BD SST Microtainer Gold tubes (BD Biosciences) and serum extracted according to the manufacturer’s instructions prior to storage at −80 °C. Whole brains were removed, bisected sagitally, and frozen on dry ice.\nSerum steroid hormone levels were assayed by ELISA (dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS) and DHEA DRG International; corticosterone, Enzo Biosciences) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, with sample dilution as necessary and samples run in triplicate. Samples were taken from vehicle-treated mice (n = 9 for DHEA and corticosterone, and n = 10 for DHEAS), and 667-COUMATE treated mice (n = 15 for all compounds); DHEAS and DHEA levels were both measured in vehicle-treated (n = 8) and 667-COUMATE-treated (n = 15) mice. Standard curves were determined using SigmaPlot 11.0 (Systat Software Inc.) according to the equation: y = y0 + (ab/(b + x)) where y0, a and b are constants.\nHigh-quality total RNA was extracted from the right hemisphere of the brain using RNeasy Universal Midi Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For Experiment 1, RNA was extracted from vehicle-treated mice and 667-COUMATE treated mice (n = 12 per group). For Experiment 2, RNA was extracted from mice administered 667-COUMATE with ziprasidone (0 mg/kg)(n = 11), mice administered 667-COUMATE with ziprasidone (0.3 mg/kg)(n = 11) and mice administered 667-COUMATE with ziprasidone (1.0 mg/kg)(n = 6). 20 μl cDNA solution was synthesised from 4 to 5 μg RNA using RNA-to-cDNA EcoDry Premix with random primers (Clontech), and was diluted 50-fold with distilled water. Quantitative PCR analysis was performed using the ΔC t  method using  Gapdh ,  Hprt  and  Rn18   s  as housekeeping genes ( Trent et al., 2014 ) (primer sequences available in Supplemental  Table S1 ). Table S1\nData were analysed using SPSS 20 (IBM Corporation, New York). Normal data (as determined by Shapiro-Wilk test) were analysed by unpaired two-tailed (unless stated otherwise)  t -test/One Way ANOVA or Two Way Repeated Measures or Mixed Model ANOVA, with a between-group factor of DRUG TREATMENT and a within-group factor of TIMEPOINT or PULSE TYPE. Startle data were analysed using bodyweight and ‘pressure exerted in the absence of a stimulus’ as covariates. Where sphericity assumptions were violated in ANOVA, Greenhouse-Geisser corrected degrees of freedom values are presented. Post hoc pairwise comparisons were performed using the Sidak test. Non-parametric data were analysed by one or two-tailed Mann—Whitney  U  test. Correlational analyses for normally and non-normally distributed data were performed using Pearson test or Spearman Rank-Order Correlation respectively. P-values of <0.05 were regarded as nominally significant. Normally-distributed data are reported as mean values ± standard error of the mean, and non-parametric data as median values with 95% confidence intervals (obtained by bootstrapping).\n\nInitial litter sizes (i.e. prior to the first injection) were comparable between the vehicle and 667-COUMATE treatment groups; the number of pups found dead was equivalently low for both groups ( Table 1 ). All mothers built and maintained normal nests.\n667-COUMATE treatment in the mother did not affect gross health or bodyweight (DRUG TREATMENT: F[1,29] = 1.18, p = 0.29, DRUG TREATMENT x TIMEPOINT: F[3,87] = 2.15, p = 0.10). Pup health was normal across the course of the experiment; mean pup weight increased equivalently across both experimental groups from ∼1.30 g to ∼1.75 g (DRUG TREATMENT: F[1,29] = 0.42, p = 0.52, TIMEPOINT: F[2.1, 61.1] = 3.39, p = 0.038, DRUG TREATMENT x TIMEPOINT: F[2.1, 61.1] = 0.47, p = 0.64).\nTreatment with 667-COUMATE in new mothers resulted in a significantly reduced latency to enter the open arms of the maze, and a significantly greater propensity towards rearing; these effects occurred in the absence of significant effects on other behavioural measures assessed in this test ( Table 1 ).\nThe experimental groups showed an equivalent decrease in activity over the course of the 1hr test session (from ∼515 to ∼305 infrared beam breaks per 15 min bin) (DRUG TREATMENT: F[1,29] = 0.00, p = 0.97; TIMEPOINT: F[1.68,48.7] = 24.6, p < 0.001; DRUG TREATMENT x TIMEPOINT: F[1.68,48.7] = 0.40, p = 0.64).\nThere was no significant effect of treatment on initial mean startle response to three pulses of 120 dB (i.e. 55 dB above background)(vehicle: 55 ± 10 arbitrary startle units, 667-COUMATE: 61 ± 15 arbitrary startle units, F[1,27] = 0.01, p = 0.94).\nOn the ‘pulse alone’ and ‘prepulse’ trials, there was the expected pattern of reduced startle response with increasing levels of prepulse (PULSE TYPE, F[3,29] = 54.4, p < 0.001); whilst there was no main effect of DRUG TREATMENT (F[1,29.5] = 1.41, p = 0.25), there was a significant DRUG TREATMENT x PULSE TYPE interaction (F[3,29] = 3.05, p = 0.044) with 667-COUMATE-treated mice displaying reduced startle when no, or a minimal, prepulse stimulus was present ( Fig. 1 A). Although there was the expected trend of increased startle inhibition with increasing volumes of the prepulse (F[1.66,48.1] = 86.5, p < 0.001), there was no significant main effect of DRUG TREATMENT (F[1,29] = 0.39, p = 0.85) nor any significant DRUG TREATMENT x PULSE TYPE interaction (F[1.66,48.1] = 0.70, p = 0.48) ( Fig. 1 B).\nIncreasing stimulus volume from background (70 dB) to 120 dB was associated with increased startle response in both groups consistent with normal hearing and motor reactivity (DRUG TREATMENT (F[1,29.2] = 1.70, p = 0.20, PULSE TYPE F[5,29] = 17.39, p < 0.001, DRUG TREATMENT x PULSE TYPE (F[5,29] = 1.68, p = 0.17)( Fig. 1 C); on average, startle in drug-treated mice at pulses of 110 dB and 120 dB was lower than in vehicle-treated mice, consistent with the data presented above.\nSerum DHEAS levels showed the expected trend towards higher levels in the drug-treated group, whilst serum DHEA levels were, on average, lower in the drug-treated group ( Table 1 ). For mice in which both DHEAS and DHEA levels were measured, the ratio of median DHEAS:median DHEA levels was 189 for the vehicle-treated group and 620 for the 667-COUMATE treated group (i.e. ∼3.3fold higher in drug-treated mice than in vehicle-treated mice). Consistent with our previous data in adult male MF1 mice ( Trent et al., 2013 ), there was a significant inverse correlation between serum DHEA levels and 1hr locomotor activity in postpartum females (r s  = −0.416, p = 0.043). Serum corticosterone levels did not differ between groups ( Table 1 ).\nOur behavioural data indicated drug-induced effects on elevated plus-maze rearing and latency to enter the open arms in the same task; intriguingly, these two measures are strongly influenced by a small quantitative trait locus between 21–23 cM on mouse chromosome 15 ( Henderson et al., 2004 ), a region syntenic with human chromosome 8q24. Thus, we compared the expression of 17 genes with known products within this interval ( http://www.informatics.jax.org/marker , last accessed 2nd September 2016) in vehicle and 667-COUMATE-treated hemibrains. Only one between-group comparison (for  Nov , also known as  Ccn3 ) was significant, with higher expression in drug-treated tissue (t[22] = −2.19, p = 0.039,  Fig. 2 A) (p ≥ 0.12 for other comparisons).\nThe nominally-significant effect of 667-COUMATE treatment on  Nov/Ccn3  expression would not survive correction for multiple testing. We considered that if significant effects of 667-COUMATE treatment on the expression of one or more of the other five members of the  Nov/Ccn  gene family were to be found, this would provide additional confidence that the original finding was a true effect. Both the expression of  Ctgf/Ccn2  and  Wisp1/Ccn4  were significantly increased in 667-COUMATE-treated tissue (t[22] = −2.15, p = 0.043 and t[17.27] = −2.47, p = 0.024 respectively), whilst expression levels of  Cyr61/Ccn1 ,  Wisp2/Ccn5  and  Wisp3/Ccn6  did not differ between the two conditions (t[22] = 0.01, p = 0.99, p = 0.11, and t[22] = 0.67, p = 0.51 respectively)( Fig. 2 B).\nWe then assessed the expression of three immune-related genes ( Ccl2 ,  Cxcl1  and  Il33 ) whose activity is thought to be regulated by  Nov/Ccn3  ( Le Dreau et al., 2010 ,  Perbal, 2006 ), and that have previously been implicated in PP ( Ccl2 ) or bipolar disorder ( Il33 ) pathogenesis ( Barbosa et al., 2014 ,  Bergink et al., 2013 ). Brain  Ccl2  expression levels were significantly elevated in 667-COUMATE-treated mice (t[22] = −2.28, p = 0.033), whilst  Cxcl1  and  Il33  levels were equivalent between the two groups (t[22] = −0.10, p = 0.92 and t[22] = 0.30, p = 0.77 respectively)( Fig. 2 C). We also examined the expression of: a) murine orthologues of three genes suggested as positional candidates for PP ( Jones et al., 2007 ) ( Abat  and  Grin2a  at 16p13, and  Adcy8  at 8q24), b) two genes within 16p13 whose expression correlates with  CTGF / CCN2  or  NOV / CCN3  expression in developing human brain tissue ( Li et al., 2016 ) ( Hba-a1/a2  and  Arhgdig ), and c) two genes suggested by genomewide association studies as candidates for bipolar disorder ( Cacna1c  and  Odz4/Tenm4 )( Harrison, 2016 ).  Adcy8  expression was significantly higher in the brains of 667-COUMATE-treated mice (t[22] = −2.17, p = 0.041), consistent with previous evidence that adenylate cyclase (Adcy) activity might be involved in the mechanoregulation of the Ccn genes ( Schild and Trueb, 2004 );  Arhgdig  expression was also increased in 667-COUMATE-treated brain relative to vehicle-treated brain (t[22] = −2.375, p = 0.027)( Fig. 2 C), and  Nov/Ccn3  and  Arhgdig  expression (as indexed by ΔCt values) was significantly positively correlated across both experimental groups (r = 0.51, p = 0.01). There was no effect of DRUG TREATMENT on the expression of  Abat ,  Grin2a ,  Hba-a1/a2 ,  Cacna1c  or  Odz4/Tenm4  (t[22] = −0.29, p = 0.78, t[22] = −0.67, p = 0.51, t[20.2] = −1.04, p = 0.31, t[22] = −1.13, p = 0.27 and t[22] = −1.09, p = 0.29 respectively) ( Fig. 2 C).\nFinally, we examined the expression of two serotonergic system genes:  Htr2a  (encoding a primary target for antipsychotic drug action) and  Htr2c  (the expression of which may be affected by Sts deficiency,  Trent et al., 2012 ). The expression level of neither of these two genes was affected by DRUG TREATMENT ( Htr2a : t[22] = 0.08, p = 0.94, and  Htr2c : t[22] = 0.27, p = 0.79)( Fig. 2 C). Overall, our gene expression data indicate a high degree of specificity to the effects of 667-COUMATE.\nInitial live litter sizes (i.e. prior to any injections) did not differ between the CVCV, CZCZ0.3 and CZCZ1.0 groups; the number of pups found dead was equivalently low for all groups ( Table 2 ). All mothers built and maintained normal nests.\nMaternal health and bodyweight was not significantly differentially affected by DRUG TREATMENT (F[2,37] = 1.83, p = 0.18, DRUG TREATMENT x TIMEPOINT: F[1.4, 76.0] = 0.34, p = 0.83). Pup health also appeared normal across the course of the experiment; mean pup weight increased equivalently across all groups (from ∼1.30 g to ∼1.80 g) (DRUG TREATMENT: F[2,37] = 0.47, p = 0.63, TIMEPOINT: F[1.5, 57.0] = 2.02, p = 0.15, DRUG TREATMENT x TIMEPOINT: F[3.1, 57.0] = 0.40, p = 0.76).\nWe hypothesised that, in 667-COUMATE-treated mice, ziprasidone administration would attenuate rearing in the elevated plus-maze and increase latency to enter the open arms in the absence of minimal effects on activity. Overall, rearing levels were low and equivalent across the three groups ( Table 2 ). Whilst median first open arm entry latencies did increase across the three groups, this was not significant ( Table 2 ). The interpretation of the rearing and open arm entry data is complicated by the fact that both doses of ziprasidone tended to reduce activity in the aversive elevated plus-maze, as indexed by closed arm entries ( Table 2 ). In contrast to the closed arm entry data in the elevated plus-maze, we found no significant difference between groups in terms of their overall number of beam breaks in the relatively non-aversive locomotor activity paradigm ( Table 2 ), indicating that the reduced activity in the antipsychotic-treated groups in the elevated plus-maze test may have been partially due to the anxiogenic effect of ziprasidone in 667-COUMATE treated mice.\nWe further hypothesised that, in 667-COUMATE-treated mice, the administration of ziprasidone would enhance the startle response, particularly when a prepulse stimulus was absent or small. Ziprasidone did dose-dependently enhance startle, though for all values of pulse-prepulse pairings (DRUG TREATMENT: F[2148] = 9.44, p < 0.001, PULSE TYPE: F[3148] = 3.29, p = 0.023, DRUG TREATMENT x PULSE TYPE: F[6148] = 0.08, p = 1.00,  Fig. 3 A).\nWe compared the brain expression of genes whose expression differed significantly in Experiment 1 (i.e.  Nov/Ccn3 ,  Ctgf/Ccn2 ,  Wisp1/Ccn4 ,  Ccl2 ,  Adcy8 , and  Arhgdig  in mice treated with 667-COUMATE plus one of three doses of ziprasidone (0, 0.3 or 1.0 mg/kg)( Fig. 3 B).  Nov/Ccn3  expression was significantly affected by DRUG TREATMENT, with significantly lower expression in the CZCZ1.0 group relative to the other two groups (F[2,25] = 5.07, p = 0.014, p < 0.05 for pairwise comparisons with 1.0 mg/kg group).  Adcy8  expression was significantly affected by DRUG TREATMENT, with higher expression in the CZCZ1.0 group relative to the other two groups (p < 0.01, p < 0.005 for pairwise comparisons with CVCV and CZCZ0.3 groups respectively). The expression of  Ctgf/Ccn2 ,  Wisp1 / Ccn4 ,  Ccl2  and  Arhgdig  genes did not differ as a function of DRUG TREATMENT (F[2,25] = 0.90, p = 0.42, F[2,25] = 0.54, p = 0.59, F[2,25] = 3.36, p = 0.051, and p = 0.44 respectively).\n\nThe molecular pathophysiology of PP is poorly defined, partially as a consequence of having no amenable animal models; the main animal model for PP currently is the ‘porcine infanticide model’ ( Quilter et al., 2007 ) which, although valuable, is impractical for large-scale experimental studies and does not accurately reflect the PP phenotype (most mothers with PP are not infanticidal).\nWe used pharmacological techniques to produce an experimentally-amenable mouse model of PP with some degree of face, construct and predictive validity that may indicate underlying pathogenic processes. Briefly, acute postpartum inhibition of the steroid sulfatase enzyme in mouse mothers, predicted on the basis of theory to give rise to PP-related phenotypes (‘construct validity’)( Davies, 2012 ), elicits phenotypes of relevance to PP. In terms of behavioural face validity, 667-COUMATE-treated mice exhibited: a) a reduced startle response with preserved PPI (a phenotype seen in bipolar disorder and dependent upon levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines ( Beck and Catuzzi, 2013 )) and b) alterations in elevated plus-maze behaviour, likely to be influenced by a region of chromosome 15 (syntenic to the PP candidate region 8q24 in man). These behavioural phenotypes were not confounded by the effects of 667-COUMATE on maternal/pup health, or maternal activity. In terms of endocrinological face validity, 667-COUMATE treated mice, like women with PP ( Epperson and Ballew, 2006 ), exhibited normal corticosterone/cortisol levels. In terms of molecular face validity, our model showed alterations in the brain expression of a gene previously implicated in bipolar disorder and PP ( Adcy8 ) ( Jones et al., 2007 ) and a gene encoding a pro-inflammatory cytokine ( Ccl2 ) whose levels are elevated in serum of individuals with PP ( Bergink et al., 2013 ); the abnormal expression of these genes may contribute towards the behavioural profiles of the drug-treated mice. As one 667-COUMATE-induced behavioural phenotype (reduced startle response) could be reversed by the administration of an antipsychotic used to treat PP, the model may also have some degree of predictive validity. The extent to which the model recapitulates other features of PP remains to be established. Moreover, whilst 667-COUMATE is an effective inhibitor of STS, it may have off-target effects, notably on carbonic anhydrase II ( Ho et al., 2003 ); these off-target effects have no gross effects on maternal health, but their contribution to the more subtle changes in drug-treated mice is difficult to quantify. In support of steroid sulfatase inhibition-mediated effects on the gene expression differences reported here, DHEA influences  Ctgf / Ccn2  ( Zhang et al., 2013 ) and  Ccl2  (or  MCP-1 )( Wang et al., 2011 ) expression and secretion in females.\nOur gene expression work indicated altered expression of several members of the Ccn gene family in 667-COUMATE treated brain. This gene family, which encodes a number of secreted extracellular matrix-associated proteins expressed in the brain ( Malik et al., 2015 ), represents an interesting candidate for effects on PP risk given: a) its known involvement in female reproductive function ( Winterhager and Gellhaus, 2014 ), b) its dynamic brain expression throughout pregnancy and the puerperium ( Ray et al., 2015 ), c) its modulation of Notch and Wnt signalling pathways ( Winterhager and Gellhaus, 2014 ) that are disrupted in bipolar disorder ( Pedroso et al., 2012 ) and cases of postpartum psychiatric disturbance ( Pantoni et al., 2005 ) and d) the known role of extracellular-matrix dysfunction in the pathophysiology of mood disorders ( Lubbers et al., 2014 ). Additionally, Ccn gene expression may be altered by the administration of psychotomimetic agents ( Sakuma et al., 2015 ), by social stress ( Stankiewicz et al., 2015 ), and by small molecules including cytokines and serotonin ( Chen et al., 2014 ).\nUsing methods agnostic to gene function, we have specifically implicated  NOV / CCN3 , encoding a biologically-relevant protein: a) its overexpression is associated with abnormal maternal behaviour which can be reversed through antipsychotic administration (present study), b) it is located ∼138 cM on human chromosome 8, below the linkage peak indicated from a sample of individuals with bipolar affective puerperal psychosis (137.5–147.5 cM) ( Jones et al., 2007 ), c) the associated protein is thought to modulate intracellular calcium signalling ( Lombet et al., 2003 ) a process that goes awry in both bipolar disorder ( Harrison, 2016 ) and PP ( Riley and Watt, 1985 ), d) its expression is repressed by oestrogen ( Vendrell et al., 2004 ), e) it encodes a regulator of placental angiogenesis and its expression is perturbed in cases of pre-eclampsia ( Winterhager and Gellhaus, 2014 ), f) it is highly expressed in the cortex and limbic system of the adult human brain ( Malik et al., 2015 ), g) it can regulate axonal outgrowth of callosal projection neurons ( Park et al., 2015 ) consistent with corpus callosum abnormalities in PP cases ( Udaya et al., 2015 ), h) it lies adjacent to a polymorphism associated with smoking cessation ( Argos et al., 2014 ) and its expression is downregulated in female tissues exposed to cigarette smoke ( Gueugnon et al., 2016 ), and i) small genomic duplications encompassing  NOV / CCN3  have been associated with bipolar disorder ( Macayran et al., 2006 ). Given possible thyroid dysfunction in PP ( Bergink et al., 2011 ), it is also interesting that cortical  Nov / Ccn3  and  Adcy8  expression is regulated by 3,5,3′-triiodo- l -thyronine (T3) ( Berbel et al., 2014 ). Finally, recent work has shown that wildtype mouse mothers carrying pups with genetic mutations perturbing placental function exhibit abnormal behaviour and significantly increased hippocampal  Nov / Ccn3  gene expression ( Creeth et al., 2015  and Hugo Creeth, pers. comm.).\nThe study has two main limitations. First, in the absence of data on behaviour or gene expression in non-postpartum mice administered 667-COUMATE, we cannot ascertain whether STS deficiency and its sequelae confer risk of abnormal maternal phenotypes in the postpartum period only, or confer risk of abnormal maternal behaviour though mechanisms operating both within, and outside, the postpartum period. Second, for the gene expression analyses we used a hemibrain dissection given that no individual brain region has robustly been shown to function abnormally in PP cases, and to capture large gene expression changes within one brain region or smaller gene changes throughout multiple brain regions; however, this approach may be insensitive to small gene expression changes in specific brain regions.\n\nOur results indicate that acute postpartum steroid sulfatase deficiency results in abnormal maternal behaviour (at least in mice), and begin to define a brain pathway that may feasibly be disturbed in women diagnosed with PP i.e. signalling from the extracellular matrix to the cytoplasm via Ccn proteins, transmembrane proteins such as integrins and Notch, and intracellular molecules. Further details of the molecular pathway(s) by which steroid sulfatase inhibition influences postpartum behaviour may be revealed by hypothesis-free gene expression analyses in our mouse model. Our data offer support for  STS  (Xp22.3),  NOV / CCN3 ,  WISP1/CCN4  and  ADCY8  (8q24) and  ARHGDIG  (16p13) as functional and positional candidate genes for PP risk, and indicate that analyses comparing genetic variation within these genes, or their physiological correlates (e.g. serum DHEA(S) levels), in samples of healthy nulliparous and parous controls and PP cases is warranted.\n\nThe work was funded by the  Wellcome Trust  (105216/Z/14/Z) the  Medical Research Council UK  (MR/L010305/1), an Erasmus grant from  University of Barcelona , and  Cardiff University . The authors have no competing financial interests in relation to the work described.\n\nThe authors declare no conflict of interest. The funding bodies did not play any role in the design of the study, in data collection or analysis, or in the decision to publish.","source_license":"CC0","license_restricted":false}