{"paper_id":"4c2a97c2-31a2-4adf-bb52-943a96142f08","body_text":"Abstract\nThere are several theories as to how endometriosis develops, but the most widely accepted one is Sampson’s theory. First hypothesized in 1927, Sampson’s theory [1] states that three elements are required to cause endometriosis: retrograde menstruation, the presence of viable cells within the retrograde menstruation, and the implantation of these viable endometrial cells, which continue to grow and form peritoneal lesions [1].\nAccess this chapter\nTax calculation will be finalised at checkout\nPurchases are for personal use only\nSimilar content being viewed by others\nReferences\nSampson, J. A. (1927). Metastatic or embolic endometriosis, due to the menstrual dissemination of endometrial tissue into the venous circulation. The American Journal of Pathology, 3(2): 93–110.143.\nGiudice, L. C., & Kao, L. C. (2004). Endometriosis. Lancet, 364(9447), 1789–1799.\nHalme, J., Hammond, M. G., Hulka, J. F., Raj, S. G., & Talbert, L. M. (1984). Retrograde menstruation in healthy women and in patients with endometriosis. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 64(2), 151–154.\nKruitwagen, R. F., Poels, L. G., Willemsen, W. N., de Ronde, I. J., Jap, P. H., & Rolland, R. (1991). Endometrial epithelial cells in peritoneal fluid during the early follicular phase. Fertility and Sterility, 55(2), 297–303.\nLiu, D. T., & Hitchcock, A. (1986). Endometriosis: Its association with retrograde menstruation, dysmenorrhoea and tubal pathology. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 93(8), 859–862.\n(1983). Retrograde menstruation. Lancet, 2(8340): 25–26.\nVinatier, D., Orazi, G., Cosson, M., & Dufour, P. (2001). Theories of endometriosis. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, 96(1), 21–34.\nVigano, P., Parazzini, F., Somigliana, E., & Vercellini, P. (2004). Endometriosis: Epidemiology and aetiological factors. Best Practice & Research. Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 18(2), 177–200.\nEl-Mahgoub, S., & Yaseen, S. (1980). A positive proof for the theory of coelomic metaplasia. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 137(1), 137–140.\nSuginami, H. (1991). A reappraisal of the coelomic metaplasia theory by reviewing endometriosis occurring in unusual sites and instances. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 165(1), 214–218.\nSchrodt, G. R., Alcorn, M. O., & Ibanez, J. (1980). Endometriosis of the male urinary system: A case report. The Journal of Urology, 124(5), 722–723.\nMartin, J. D., Jr., & Hauck, A. E. (1985). Endometriosis in the male. The American Surgeon, 51(7), 426–430.\nDictor, M., Nelson, C. E., & Uvelius, B. (1988). Priapism in a patient with endometrioid prostatic carcinoma. A case report. Urologia Internationalis, 43(4), 245–247.\nPinkert, T. C., Catlow, C. E., & Straus, R. (1979). Endometriosis of the urinary bladder in a man with prostatic carcinoma. Cancer, 43(4), 1562–1567.\nLongo, L. D. (1979). Classic pages in obstetrics and gynecology. Aberrant portions of the mullerian duct found in an ovary: William Wood Russell Johns Hopkins Hospital Bulletin, vol. 10, pp. 8–10, 1899. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 134(2), 225–226.\nUeki, M. (1991). Histologic study of endometriosis and examination of lymphatic drainage in and from the uterus. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 165(1), 201–209.\nCassina, P. C., Hauser, M., Kacl, G., Imthurn, B., Schroder, S., & Weder, W. (1997). Catamenial hemoptysis. Diagnosis with MRI. Chest, 111(5), 1447–1450.\nLeyendecker, G., Wildt, L., & Mall, G. (2009). The pathophysiology of endometriosis and adenomyosis: Tissue injury and repair. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 280(4), 529–538.\nQuinn, M. J. (2011). Endometriosis: The consequence of uterine denervation-reinnervation. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 284(6), 1423–1429.\nMaruyama, T., & Yoshimura, Y. (2012). Stem cell theory for the pathogenesis of endometriosis. Frontiers in Bioscience (Elite Edition), 4, 2854–2863.\nGargett, C. E., Schwab, K. E., Brosens, J. J., Puttemans, P., Benagiano, G., & Brosens, I. (2014). Potential role of endometrial stem/progenitor cells in the pathogenesis of early-onset endometriosis. Molecular Human Reproduction, 20(7), 591–598.\nAuthor information\nAuthors and Affiliations\nCorresponding author\nRights and permissions\nCopyright information\n© 2015 The Author(s)\nAbout this chapter\nCite this chapter\nGupta, S., Harlev, A., Agarwal, A., Pandithurai, E. (2015). Theories on Endometriosis. In: Endometriosis. SpringerBriefs in Reproductive Biology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18308-4_3\nDownload citation\nDOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18308-4_3\nPublisher Name: Springer, Cham\nPrint ISBN: 978-3-319-18307-7\nOnline ISBN: 978-3-319-18308-4\neBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)\nKeywords\nThese keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.","source_license":"CC0","license_restricted":false}